ABNB vs. KMLM
ABNB (Airbnb, Inc.) is a stock, while KMLM (KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund tracking the KFA MLM Index. Over the past 5 years, ABNB returned 1.02%/yr vs 5.77%/yr for KMLM. Their -0.06 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
ABNB vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNB achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly lower than KMLM's 12.95% return.
ABNB
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 0.58%
- 5Y*
- 1.02%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.66%
KMLM
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 6.85%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 18.19%
- 3Y*
- 0.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.77%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | $486.75M | $492.54M | $539.45M |
| $14.29M | $9.53M | $7.83M |
ABNB vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 11.64% | 3.28% | -3.47% | 59.23% | -48.65% | 13.41% | 0.55% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 12.95% | -2.98% | -1.69% | -5.66% | 30.61% | 7.04% | 4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNB and KMLM is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | -0.06 |
The correlation between ABNB and KMLM shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNB vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank
ABNB
KMLM
ABNB vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNB | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.28 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 1.86 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 6.03 | -3.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNB vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNB drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNB and KMLM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNB | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -27.47% | -34.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.21% | -9.61% | -7.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.16% | -22.28% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.19% | -27.47% | -32.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.12% | -11.93% | -18.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -12.79% | -23.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.80% | 2.95% | +3.85% |
Volatility
ABNB vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison
Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 3.70%. This indicates that ABNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNB | KMLM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 3.70% | +5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.30% | 10.31% | +13.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.57% | 11.49% | +19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.84% | 14.53% | +29.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.71% | 14.66% | +31.05% |
Dividends
ABNB vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison
ABNB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABNB Airbnb, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KMLM KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF | 4.45% | 5.02% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 13.22% | 6.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNB and KMLM have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABNB has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to KMLM (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNB dropped -61.96% vs KMLM's -27.47%.
KMLM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABNB and KMLM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer