ABM vs. MSA
ABM (ABM Industries Incorporated) and MSA (MSA Safety Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ABM in Specialty Business Services, MSA in Security & Protection Services. Over the past 10 years, ABM returned 3.34%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for MSA. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABM vs. MSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABM achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than MSA's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ABM has underperformed MSA with an annualized return of 3.34%, while MSA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.54% annualized return.
ABM
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- -2.77%
- 1Y
- -6.64%
- 3Y*
- -0.78%
- 5Y*
- -0.65%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
MSA
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- -2.56%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
ABM vs. MSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 1.73% | -15.53% | 16.35% | 3.04% | 10.73% | 9.81% | 2.14% | 20.39% | -13.05% | -6.13% |
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | -0.18% | -2.14% | -0.71% | 18.52% | -3.15% | 2.14% | 19.79% | 36.10% | 23.61% | 13.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABM and MSA is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 1990 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ABM and MSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.46 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABM:
$2.59
MSA:
$9.85
ABM:
16.37
MSA:
16.13
ABM:
0.50
MSA:
0.06
ABM:
0.29
MSA:
2.45
ABM:
$9.05B
MSA:
$1.92B
ABM:
$1.04B
MSA:
$897.30M
ABM:
$398.40M
MSA:
$465.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABM vs. MSA — Risk / Return Rank
ABM
MSA
ABM vs. MSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABM | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | -0.12 | -0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | -0.26 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABM | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | -0.11 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.01 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 | 0.47 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.34 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
ABM vs. MSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABM drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum MSA drawdown of -70.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABM and MSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABM | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -70.32% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.78% | -21.29% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.37% | -34.28% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.37% | -34.28% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.00% | -38.39% | -13.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.96% | -21.29% | -3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -17.44% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.19% | 9.79% | +2.40% |
Volatility
ABM vs. MSA - Volatility Comparison
ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) has a higher volatility of 9.24% compared to MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) at 6.61%. This indicates that ABM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABM | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.24% | 6.61% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.35% | 17.65% | +4.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.65% | 23.93% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 24.71% | +6.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.80% | 28.78% | +5.02% |
Dividends
ABM vs. MSA - Dividend Comparison
ABM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than MSA's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 2.62% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 2.18% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.69% |
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | 1.34% | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.58% | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.92% |
Financials
ABM vs. MSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ABM Industries Incorporated and MSA Safety Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABM vs. MSA - Profitability Comparison
ABM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a gross profit of 277.00M and revenue of 2.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.1%.
MSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 219.58M and revenue of 463.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.
ABM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported an operating income of 86.90M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
MSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 93.01M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
ABM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ABM Industries Incorporated reported a net income of 43.10M and revenue of 2.29B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
MSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABM and MSA have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABM has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to MSA (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABM dropped -59.64% vs MSA's -70.32%.
MSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABM and MSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer