ABM vs. LEG
ABM (ABM Industries Incorporated) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. ABM operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ABM returned 3.89%/yr vs -11.28%/yr for LEG. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABM vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABM achieves a 7.63% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ABM has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 3.89%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -11.28% annualized return.
ABM
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- -6.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.89%
LEG
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- -10.27%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.47%
- 10Y*
- -11.28%
ABM vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 7.63% | -15.53% | 16.35% | 3.04% | 10.73% | 9.81% | 2.14% | 20.39% | -13.05% | -6.13% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 0.42% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABM and LEG is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.34 |
The correlation between ABM and LEG shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABM:
$2.61B
LEG:
$1.49B
ABM:
$2.59
LEG:
$1.60
ABM:
17.21
LEG:
6.85
ABM:
0.30
LEG:
0.51
ABM:
1.51
LEG:
1.48
ABM:
$9.05B
LEG:
$3.03B
ABM:
$1.04B
LEG:
$717.40M
ABM:
$398.40M
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABM vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
ABM
LEG
ABM vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABM | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.08 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 0.28 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 0.57 | -1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABM vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABM drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABM and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABM | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -86.41% | +26.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.78% | -28.51% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.37% | -76.78% | +42.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.37% | -84.29% | +49.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.00% | -86.41% | +34.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.61% | -76.78% | +56.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | -19.76% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 14.12% | -1.77% |
Volatility
ABM vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ABM Industries Incorporated (ABM) is 7.08%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 10.79%. This indicates that ABM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABM | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.08% | 10.79% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.42% | 31.85% | -12.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.49% | 49.11% | -21.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.04% | 42.59% | -11.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.85% | 39.87% | -6.02% |
Dividends
ABM vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
ABM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than LEG's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABM ABM Industries Incorporated | 2.54% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.96% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 1.47% | 2.40% | 2.18% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.69% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.83% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
ABM vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ABM Industries Incorporated and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABM and LEG have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to ABM (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABM dropped -59.64% vs LEG's -86.41%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABM and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer