PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABLS vs. VPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABLS vs. VPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABLS vs. VPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ABLS
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF
-8.16%-8.72%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
-11.66%-11.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a -8.16% return, which is significantly higher than VPC's -11.66% return.


ABLS

1D
2.53%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-8.16%
6M
-10.53%
1Y
-10.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VPC

1D
2.93%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
-11.66%
6M
-12.28%
1Y
-16.52%
3Y*
2.20%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABLS vs. VPC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than VPC's 5.53% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ABLS vs. VPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS
ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

VPC
VPC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
VPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPC Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
VPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLS vs. VPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABLSVPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

-1.00

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

-1.30

+0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.83

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

-0.74

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.91

-1.75

+0.84

ABLS vs. VPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is higher than the VPC Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLS and VPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABLSVPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

-1.00

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

0.18

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between ABLS and VPC is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ABLS vs. VPC - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.31%, less than VPC's 17.77% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
ABLS
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF
15.31%14.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VPC
Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF
17.77%14.33%11.26%11.71%10.74%6.31%10.06%8.19%

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. VPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum VPC drawdown of -53.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and VPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABLSVPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

-53.45%

+34.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-22.76%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.17%

-21.75%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-7.41%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

9.59%

-3.72%

Volatility

ABLS vs. VPC - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to Virtus Private Credit Strategy ETF (VPC) at 5.51%. This indicates that ABLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABLSVPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

5.51%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

10.48%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.94%

16.60%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.01%

13.39%

+8.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

20.68%

+1.33%