ABLS vs. CVSM

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ABLS is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.

Performance

ABLS vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ABLS

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -3.94%
• 6M: 16.41%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 1Y: 14.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.62%

CVSM

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	$105.10K	$83.71K	$40.86K
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	$48.53K	$49.87K	$42.10K

ABLS vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	11.23%
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLS and CVSM is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026	0.36

Return for Risk

ABLS vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 27
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 26
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CVSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABLS vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLS	CVSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.07	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.11	—	—

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and CVSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLS	CVSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-3.36%	-15.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.68%	-2.33%	-2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-0.96%	-6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.84%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ABLS	CVSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.35%	11.65%	+6.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.05%	11.65%	+9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.05%	11.65%	+9.40%

ABLS vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLS vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.66%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	12.66%	14.04%
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	0.23%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLS and CVSM in my portfolio?

ABLS and CVSM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ABLS or CVSM?

On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLS or CVSM?

ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLS or CVSM?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 12.66%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.

What is the main difference between ABLS and CVSM?

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 0.55% for CVSM.