ABLS vs. CVSM
ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ABLS is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
ABLS vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ABLS
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 12.17%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABLS vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 12.07% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABLS and CVSM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABLS vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
ABLS
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ABLS vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABLS | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABLS vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABLS | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.28% | -3.36% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.97% | -1.46% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -1.01% | -6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | — | — |
Volatility
ABLS vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABLS | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.05% | 11.19% | +6.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 11.19% | +9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 11.19% | +9.95% |
ABLS vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABLS vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF | 12.57% | 14.04% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABLS and CVSM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 12.57%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: Abacus and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for ABLS and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer