ABLS vs. ABOT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and ABOT (Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while ABOT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FCF US Quality Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABLS returned 10.91% vs 7.19% for ABOT. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.

Performance

ABLS vs. ABOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly higher than ABOT's 3.75% return.

ABLS

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 6.47%
• 6M: 12.17%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 1Y: 10.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABOT

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 7.04%
• 6M: 4.59%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 1Y: 7.19%
• 3Y*: 16.80%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLS vs. ABOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	14.58%	-8.72%
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF	3.75%	0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLS and ABOT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.69

The correlation between ABLS and ABOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ABLS vs. ABOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 20
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 19
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

ABOT

ABOT Risk / Return Rank: 15
ABOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ABOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ABOT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
ABOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
ABOT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLS vs. ABOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLS	ABOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.39	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	0.65	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.08	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.34	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	0.78	+1.12

ABLS vs. ABOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the ABOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLS and ABOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. ABOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum ABOT drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and ABOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLS	ABOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-29.71%	+10.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-21.54%	+5.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-3.20%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-9.42%	+1.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	9.24%	-3.47%

Volatility

ABLS vs. ABOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is 5.40%, while Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that ABLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLS	ABOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	5.72%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.57%	15.73%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	18.50%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.14%	19.83%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.14%	19.74%	+1.40%

ABLS vs. ABOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ABLS and ABOT have an expense ratio of 0.39%.

Dividends

ABLS vs. ABOT - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than ABOT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	12.57%	14.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF	0.33%	0.38%	1.28%	0.77%	1.20%	4.77%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLS and ABOT in my portfolio?

ABLS and ABOT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLS or ABOT?

ABOT has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to ABLS (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLS dropped -19.28% vs ABOT's -29.71%.

Which ETF is better, ABLS or ABOT?

On 1-year performance, ABLS leads with 10.91% vs 7.19% for ABOT. Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. On volatility, ABLS has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLS or ABOT?

Over the 1-year period, ABLS has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLS or ABOT?

ABLS and ABOT have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLS or ABOT?

ABLS has the higher dividend yield at 12.57%, compared with 0.33% for ABOT.

What is the main difference between ABLS and ABOT?

ABLS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ABOT is Large Cap Growth Equities. ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while ABOT tracks FCF US Quality Innovation Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.