ABIMX vs. AWF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ABIMX (AB Impact Municipal Income Shares) and AWF (AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund) are both mutual funds - ABIMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by AllianceBernstein, while AWF is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Over the past 5 years, ABIMX returned 0.91%/yr vs 4.17%/yr for AWF. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABIMX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for AWF.

Performance

ABIMX vs. AWF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Impact Municipal Income Shares (ABIMX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABIMX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than AWF's -1.75% return.

ABIMX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 2.47%
• 6M: 2.84%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: 0.91%
• 10Y*: —

AWF

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.39%
• YTD: -1.75%
• 6M: -2.21%
• 1Y: 1.19%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: 4.17%
• 10Y*: 5.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABIMX vs. AWF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABIMX AB Impact Municipal Income Shares	2.47%	3.54%	2.70%	7.90%	-12.57%	3.80%	5.87%	10.74%	1.15%	1.37%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	-1.75%	7.54%	14.30%	18.37%	-16.62%	9.95%	4.40%	23.40%	-11.35%	0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ABIMX and AWF is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2017	0.18

Return for Risk

ABIMX vs. AWF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABIMX

ABIMX Risk / Return Rank: 69
ABIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ABIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
ABIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ABIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
ABIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

AWF

AWF Risk / Return Rank: 3
AWF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Omega Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
AWF Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABIMX vs. AWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Impact Municipal Income Shares (ABIMX) and AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABIMX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	0.14	+2.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.06	0.26	+3.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.03	+0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.62	0.12	+2.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.48	0.28	+9.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABIMX vs. AWF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABIMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the AWF Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABIMX and AWF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABIMX	AWF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	0.14	+2.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.35	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.31	+0.24

Drawdowns

ABIMX vs. AWF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABIMX drawdown since its inception was -18.15%, smaller than the maximum AWF drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIMX and AWF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABIMX	AWF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.15%	-55.54%	+37.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.45%	-10.19%	+6.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.12%	-11.12%	+3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.15%	-25.25%	+7.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.85%	+5.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-12.31%	+8.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	4.27%	-3.32%

Volatility

ABIMX vs. AWF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Impact Municipal Income Shares (ABIMX) is 1.41%, while AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund (AWF) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that ABIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABIMX	AWF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	3.43%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	7.24%	-4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	8.70%	-5.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.16%	12.11%	-6.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.27%	15.22%	-9.95%

ABIMX vs. AWF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABIMX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AWF's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABIMX vs. AWF - Dividend Comparison

ABIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, less than AWF's 8.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABIMX AB Impact Municipal Income Shares	4.23%	4.13%	3.38%	2.59%	3.00%	2.07%	2.90%	3.27%	3.14%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%
AWF AllianceBernstein Global High Income Closed Fund	8.38%	7.81%	7.47%	7.33%	10.30%	6.48%	6.68%	6.62%	7.97%	6.03%	7.73%	10.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABIMX and AWF in my portfolio?

ABIMX and AWF have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABIMX or AWF?

AWF has higher volatility (3.43%) compared to ABIMX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABIMX dropped -18.15% vs AWF's -55.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.