ABIG vs. MOO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ABIG (Argent Large Cap ETF) and MOO (VanEck Agribusiness ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Argent, while MOO is a Natural Resources fund tracking the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. ABIG is actively managed, while MOO is passively managed. Over the past year, ABIG returned 15.12% vs 15.37% for MOO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABIG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for MOO.

Performance

ABIG vs. MOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABIG achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 12.85% return.

ABIG

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 1.54%
• 6M: 6.32%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 1Y: 15.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MOO

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 5.33%
• 6M: 5.70%
• YTD: 12.85%
• 1Y: 15.37%
• 3Y*: 2.31%
• 5Y*: 0.55%
• 10Y*: 7.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABIG vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	8.30%	27.75%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	12.85%	23.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ABIG and MOO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025	0.31

Return for Risk

ABIG vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABIG

ABIG Risk / Return Rank: 34
ABIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
ABIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
ABIG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ABIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ABIG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

MOO

MOO Risk / Return Rank: 34
MOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MOO Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MOO Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABIG vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABIG	MOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.08	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	1.63	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.38	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	3.55	+0.39

ABIG vs. MOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the MOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABIG and MOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABIG vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABIG drawdown since its inception was -13.70%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIG and MOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABIG	MOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.70%	-69.53%	+55.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.70%	-11.17%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-39.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.65%	-15.44%	+14.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-16.97%	+14.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	4.34%	-0.50%

Volatility

ABIG vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) is 3.53%, while VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that ABIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABIG	MOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.53%	4.22%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.66%	11.11%	-0.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.58%	14.31%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	17.17%	-0.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	18.12%	-1.59%

ABIG vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABIG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABIG vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison

ABIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than MOO's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABIG Argent Large Cap ETF	0.09%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF	2.19%	2.47%	3.41%	2.93%	2.15%	1.17%	1.10%	1.26%	1.69%	1.44%	2.14%	2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABIG and MOO in my portfolio?

ABIG and MOO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABIG or MOO?

MOO has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to ABIG (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABIG dropped -13.70% vs MOO's -69.53%.

Which ETF is better, ABIG or MOO?

On 1-year performance, MOO leads with 15.37% vs 15.12% for ABIG. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ABIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABIG or MOO?

Over the 1-year period, MOO has performed better with a 15.37% return vs 15.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABIG or MOO?

ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for MOO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABIG or MOO?

MOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 0.09% for ABIG.

What is the main difference between ABIG and MOO?

ABIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MOO is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Argent and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ABIG and 0.56% for MOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.