ABFL vs. SCHK

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ABFL (Abacus FCF Leaders ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ABFL is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ABFL returned 11.96%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ABFL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

ABFL vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABFL achieves a 16.17% return, which is significantly higher than SCHK's 10.97% return.

ABFL

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 13.50%
• YTD: 16.17%
• 1Y: 19.81%
• 3Y*: 16.42%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 9.01%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 12.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABFL vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	16.17%	8.07%	18.26%	22.97%	-14.60%	30.66%	18.30%	26.03%	-6.26%	6.83%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	10.97%	17.23%	24.48%	26.63%	-19.51%	26.17%	20.75%	31.31%	-5.09%	5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ABFL and SCHK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2017	0.93

The correlation between ABFL and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

ABFL vs. SCHK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ABFL	SCHK
Technology	38.4%	38.0%
Industrials	20.2%	8.9%
Healthcare	11.8%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	4.3%
Energy	6.9%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	9.8%
Basic Materials	4.0%	1.9%
Communication Services	3.3%	10.1%
Financial Services	2.6%	11.2%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

ABFL vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABFL

ABFL Risk / Return Rank: 50
ABFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
ABFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
ABFL Omega Ratio Rank: 38
ABFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
ABFL Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 64
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 62
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABFL vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABFL	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.68	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.33	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.30	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	2.41	+0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.65	10.52	-1.87

ABFL vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABFL and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABFL vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABFL drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABFL and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABFL	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-34.80%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.17%	-8.97%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.92%	-19.21%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	-25.44%	+3.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-0.81%	-2.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-5.13%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	2.05%	+0.25%

Volatility

ABFL vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) at 3.35%. This indicates that ABFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABFL	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.00%	3.35%	+2.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.53%	10.18%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.63%	12.84%	+3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.39%	17.35%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	19.07%	-0.30%

ABFL vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABFL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABFL vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

ABFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	0.54%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.03%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABFL and SCHK in my portfolio?

ABFL and SCHK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABFL or SCHK?

ABFL has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to SCHK (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABFL dropped -34.95% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, ABFL or SCHK?

On 5-year performance, SCHK leads with 12.59% vs 11.96% for ABFL. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHK has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABFL or SCHK?

Over the 5-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABFL or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ABFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABFL or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.54% for ABFL.

What is the main difference between ABFL and SCHK?

They also come from different issuers: Abacus and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ABFL and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.