ABFL vs. SAMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT).

ABFL and SAMT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABFL is an actively managed fund by Abacus. It was launched on Sep 27, 2016. SAMT is an actively managed fund by Strategas. It was launched on Jan 25, 2022.

Performance

ABFL vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABFL vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	-0.10%	8.07%	18.26%	22.97%	-5.36%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	1.97%	33.10%	28.15%	1.27%	-6.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABFL achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than SAMT's 1.97% return.

ABFL

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 12.02%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: —

SAMT

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 1.97%
• 6M: 6.10%
• 1Y: 35.45%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABFL vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABFL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

SAMT

Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF

ABFL

Abacus FCF Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

ABFL vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABFL

ABFL Risk / Return Rank: 35
ABFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ABFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
ABFL Omega Ratio Rank: 30
ABFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ABFL Martin Ratio Rank: 45

SAMT

SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 91
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 88
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABFL vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABFL	SAMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	2.01	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	2.65	-1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.36	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	4.10	-3.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	11.61	-7.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABFL vs. SAMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABFL Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the SAMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABFL and SAMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABFL	SAMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	2.01	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.76	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between ABFL and SAMT is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ABFL vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison

ABFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than SAMT's 0.69% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF	0.63%	0.62%	0.70%	0.94%	1.36%	9.63%	0.41%	0.72%	0.62%	0.40%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	0.69%	0.70%	1.40%	1.49%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ABFL vs. SAMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABFL drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than SAMT's maximum drawdown of -20.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABFL and SAMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABFL	SAMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.95%	-20.57%	-14.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.12%	-8.76%	-3.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.31%	-5.78%	+1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-8.00%	+2.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.10%	-0.35%

Volatility

ABFL vs. SAMT - Volatility Comparison

Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) at 4.97%. This indicates that ABFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SAMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABFL	SAMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	4.97%	+1.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	11.91%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.81%	17.68%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	16.78%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.77%	16.78%	+1.99%