ABFL vs. IBIC
ABFL (Abacus FCF Leaders ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Abacus, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. ABFL is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. Over the past year, ABFL returned 20.27% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. ABFL charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
ABFL vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABFL achieves a 16.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.
ABFL
- 1D
- -2.37%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 16.11%
- 6M
- 13.99%
- 1Y
- 20.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.28%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABFL vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF | 16.11% | 8.07% | 18.26% | 6.99% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABFL and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.03 |
The correlation between ABFL and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABFL vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
ABFL
IBIC
ABFL vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABFL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 2.22 | -1.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 16.56 | -13.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | 58.67 | -49.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABFL vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABFL drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABFL and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABFL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -0.90% | -34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | -0.27% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -0.08% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.10% | -4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 0.08% | +2.16% |
Volatility
ABFL vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF (ABFL) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that ABFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABFL | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 0.17% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 0.67% | +12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 0.89% | +15.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 1.56% | +15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 1.56% | +17.20% |
ABFL vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABFL has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABFL vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
ABFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABFL Abacus FCF Leaders ETF | 0.54% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABFL and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABFL has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABFL dropped -34.95% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, ABFL leads with 20.27% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ABFL has performed better with a 20.27% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ABFL.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.54% for ABFL.
ABFL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ABFL and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABFL and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer