ABEO vs. NRG
Compare and contrast key facts about Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG).
Performance
ABEO vs. NRG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABEO vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEO Abeona Therapeutics Inc. | -14.99% | -5.39% | 11.18% | 62.66% | -63.44% | -78.54% | -51.99% | -54.20% | -54.95% | 226.80% |
NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | -7.94% | 78.91% | 78.58% | 69.36% | -23.47% | 18.54% | -2.14% | 0.69% | 39.59% | 133.69% |
Fundamentals
ABEO:
$296.29M
NRG:
$29.08B
ABEO:
$1.14
NRG:
$4.39
ABEO:
3.92
NRG:
33.26
ABEO:
1.86
NRG:
28.21
ABEO:
$5.82M
NRG:
$0.00
ABEO:
$4.59M
NRG:
$0.00
ABEO:
$74.37M
NRG:
$1.80B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEO achieves a -14.99% return, which is significantly lower than NRG's -7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEO has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of -24.12%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 30.24% annualized return.
ABEO
- 1D
- 5.91%
- 1M
- -12.50%
- YTD
- -14.99%
- 6M
- -15.15%
- 1Y
- -5.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- -37.37%
- 10Y*
- -24.12%
NRG
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -18.34%
- YTD
- -7.94%
- 6M
- -9.25%
- 1Y
- 54.99%
- 3Y*
- 65.95%
- 5Y*
- 35.06%
- 10Y*
- 30.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABEO vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank
ABEO
NRG
ABEO vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABEO | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | 1.04 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.31 | 1.73 | -1.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.24 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.38 | -2.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 5.73 | -6.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABEO | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 | 1.04 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | 0.90 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.27 | 0.78 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.37 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEO and NRG is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ABEO vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison
ABEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEO Abeona Therapeutics Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NRG NRG Energy, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.11% | 1.81% | 2.92% | 4.40% | 3.02% | 3.20% | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.42% | 1.92% | 4.93% |
Drawdowns
ABEO vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEO and NRG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEO | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -79.41% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.32% | -23.26% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.57% | -32.62% | -62.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.58% | -48.76% | -50.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -20.59% | -79.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.61% | -28.06% | -62.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.44% | 9.68% | +13.76% |
Volatility
ABEO vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) is 13.35%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that ABEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABEO | NRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.35% | 16.78% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.21% | 32.22% | +5.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.66% | 53.33% | +7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.46% | 39.07% | +41.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.36% | 39.02% | +51.34% |
Financials
ABEO vs. NRG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abeona Therapeutics Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities