PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEO vs. NRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABEO vs. NRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEO achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly higher than NRG's -18.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEO has underperformed NRG with an annualized return of -23.25%, while NRG has yielded a comparatively higher 24.39% annualized return.


ABEO

1D
-6.19%
1M
-9.15%
YTD
3.61%
6M
12.11%
1Y
-15.74%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
-33.58%
10Y*
-23.25%

NRG

1D
-3.14%
1M
-14.23%
YTD
-18.36%
6M
-20.25%
1Y
-16.25%
3Y*
60.99%
5Y*
34.27%
10Y*
24.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEO vs. NRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABEO
Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
3.61%-5.39%11.18%62.66%-63.44%-78.54%-51.99%-54.20%-54.95%226.80%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
-18.36%78.91%78.58%69.36%-23.47%18.54%-2.14%0.69%39.59%133.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEO and NRG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2003

0.11

The correlation between ABEO and NRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABEO:

$309.15M

NRG:

$26.87B

EPS

ABEO:

$1.09

NRG:

$1.21

PE Ratio

ABEO:

5.03

NRG:

106.68

PS Ratio

ABEO:

22.87

NRG:

0.79

PB Ratio

ABEO:

2.13

NRG:

6.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABEO:

$14.54M

NRG:

$32.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABEO:

$7.56M

NRG:

$4.69B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABEO:

-$98.70M

NRG:

$2.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Abeona Therapeutics Inc.

NRG Energy, Inc.

Return for Risk

ABEO vs. NRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEO
ABEO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ABEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NRG
NRG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
NRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEO vs. NRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) and NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEONRGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.97

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

-0.50

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.62

-1.25

+0.63

ABEO vs. NRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is comparable to the NRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEO and NRG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABEONRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

-0.37

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

0.86

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.26

0.62

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.35

-0.57

Drawdowns

ABEO vs. NRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NRG's maximum drawdown of -79.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEO and NRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEONRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-79.41%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.32%

-32.57%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.48%

-32.57%

-30.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-95.14%

-32.62%

-62.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.58%

-48.76%

-50.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-29.58%

-70.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.65%

-28.00%

-62.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.30%

13.00%

+12.30%

Volatility

ABEO vs. NRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (ABEO) is 13.17%, while NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) has a volatility of 14.81%. This indicates that ABEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABEONRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

14.81%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.21%

34.44%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.08%

44.35%

+6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.72%

39.94%

+38.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.18%

39.28%

+50.90%

Dividends

ABEO vs. NRG - Dividend Comparison

ABEO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEO
Abeona Therapeutics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NRG
NRG Energy, Inc.
1.42%1.11%1.81%2.92%4.40%3.02%3.20%0.30%0.30%0.42%1.92%4.93%

Financials

ABEO vs. NRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abeona Therapeutics Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
8.72M
10.26B
(ABEO) Total Revenue
(NRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABEO and NRG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRG has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to ABEO (13.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEO dropped -100.00% vs NRG's -79.41%.

ABEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABEO and NRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer