PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEMX vs. AHYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEMX achieves a 34.30% return, which is significantly higher than AHYMX's 1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEMX has outperformed AHYMX with an annualized return of 10.73%, while AHYMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.52% annualized return.


ABEMX

1D
0.76%
1M
7.97%
YTD
34.30%
6M
35.10%
1Y
64.70%
3Y*
23.53%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.73%

AHYMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.23%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.87%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
0.13%
10Y*
1.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
34.30%32.43%3.98%6.67%-26.23%7.15%27.65%20.42%-14.65%30.25%
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
1.18%2.91%4.07%1.56%-9.36%4.06%1.81%5.23%1.50%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEMX and AHYMX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABEMX vs. AHYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEMX
ABEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ABEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

AHYMX
AHYMX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AHYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AHYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABEMXAHYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.43

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.77

2.48

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.87

8.83

+9.04

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the AHYMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEMX and AHYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEMX drawdown since its inception was -54.52%, which is greater than AHYMX's maximum drawdown of -11.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEMX and AHYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEMXAHYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.52%

-11.53%

-42.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-1.98%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.62%

-4.53%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.56%

-11.53%

-25.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.44%

-11.53%

-26.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.07%

-2.48%

-10.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

0.56%

+3.09%

Volatility

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) has a higher volatility of 11.58% compared to abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund (AHYMX) at 0.90%. This indicates that ABEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHYMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABEMXAHYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.58%

0.90%

+10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.37%

1.94%

+17.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.52%

2.65%

+18.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.22%

2.93%

+16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

2.61%

+16.32%

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABEMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AHYMX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABEMX vs. AHYMX - Dividend Comparison

ABEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, which matches AHYMX's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEMX
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund
4.55%6.11%0.99%1.42%1.82%22.95%0.68%1.85%1.57%1.32%1.23%2.47%
AHYMX
abrdn Short Duration High Yield Municipal Fund
4.56%4.52%3.32%2.21%2.05%2.31%2.74%3.10%3.39%2.82%3.28%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABEMX and AHYMX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABEMX has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to AHYMX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABEMX dropped -54.52% vs AHYMX's -11.53%.

ABEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABEMX and AHYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer