ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ABDN.L (Abrdn plc) is a stock, while R2SC.L (SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD. Over the past 10 years, ABDN.L returned 4.37%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for R2SC.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ABDN.L is traded in GBp, while R2SC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the R2SC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABDN.L achieves a 21.50% return, which is significantly higher than R2SC.L's 18.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ABDN.L has underperformed R2SC.L with an annualized return of 4.37%, while R2SC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.

ABDN.L

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 12.46%
• YTD: 21.50%
• 6M: 27.13%
• 1Y: 44.22%
• 3Y*: 14.10%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: 4.37%

R2SC.L

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 3.28%
• YTD: 18.02%
• 6M: 15.77%
• 1Y: 42.12%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 7.28%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABDN.L Abrdn plc	21.50%	57.94%	-12.84%	2.11%	-14.88%	-9.77%	-5.36%	38.83%	-37.07%	23.74%
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF	18.02%	4.66%	11.86%	12.18%	-11.55%	15.87%	15.73%	20.67%	-7.45%	4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ABDN.L and R2SC.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.44

Return for Risk

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABDN.L

ABDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 83
ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ABDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ABDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ABDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ABDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 87

R2SC.L

R2SC.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
R2SC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
R2SC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
R2SC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
R2SC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABDN.L	R2SC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.46	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.32	-1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.41	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	4.88	-1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	14.39	-4.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the R2SC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABDN.L and R2SC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABDN.L	R2SC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	2.46	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.36	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.55	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.55	-0.38

Drawdowns

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABDN.L drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than R2SC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABDN.L and R2SC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABDN.L	R2SC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-35.03%	-24.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.76%	-8.63%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.10%	-30.00%	-7.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.49%	-30.00%	-20.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.34%	-35.03%	-21.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	-0.06%	-2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.99%	-8.51%	-14.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.03%	2.94%	+2.09%

Volatility

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2SC.L) at 5.17%. This indicates that ABDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R2SC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABDN.L	R2SC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	5.17%	+3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.92%	11.78%	+12.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.88%	17.18%	+11.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.43%	20.07%	+12.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.09%	20.78%	+13.31%

Dividends

ABDN.L vs. R2SC.L - Dividend Comparison

ABDN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, while R2SC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ABDN.L Abrdn plc	6.06%	7.10%	10.34%	8.17%	7.71%	6.06%	7.68%	6.58%	22.85%	4.66%	5.06%	17.89%
R2SC.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABDN.L and R2SC.L in my portfolio?

ABDN.L and R2SC.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.