PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCS vs. VFMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ABCS vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ABCS vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
-1.83%7.95%14.47%1.97%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.55%10.52%16.91%1.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 2.55% return.


ABCS

1D
2.02%
1M
-5.12%
YTD
-1.83%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
9.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VFMV

1D
1.45%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.66%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ABCS vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ABCS vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCS
ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCS vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABCSVFMVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

0.90

-0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.13

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.87

-0.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.83

4.02

-1.19

ABCS vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCS Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCS and VFMV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABCSVFMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.65

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between ABCS and VFMV is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ABCS vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than VFMV's 2.04% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
1.37%1.37%1.39%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
2.04%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%

Drawdowns

ABCS vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and VFMV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCSVFMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-33.64%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-9.63%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.27%

-4.59%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-3.69%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

2.07%

+1.41%

Volatility

ABCS vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 3.44%. This indicates that ABCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ABCSVFMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

3.44%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

6.62%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

12.31%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

11.77%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

14.35%

+3.14%