ABCS vs. MOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO).
ABCS and MOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ABCS is a passively managed fund by Alpha Architect that tracks the performance of the BNY Mellon ABC Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2023. MOO is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS Global Agribusiness Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007. Both ABCS and MOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ABCS vs. MOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABCS vs. MOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF | -1.83% | 7.95% | 14.47% | 1.97% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 16.09% | 15.61% | -12.43% | 2.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a -1.83% return, which is significantly lower than MOO's 16.09% return.
ABCS
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -5.12%
- YTD
- -1.83%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 9.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MOO
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 16.09%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 27.55%
- 3Y*
- 2.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABCS vs. MOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than MOO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABCS vs. MOO — Risk / Return Rank
ABCS
MOO
ABCS vs. MOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABCS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.48 | 1.63 | -1.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 2.33 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.31 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.44 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.83 | 9.05 | -6.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABCS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 1.63 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.24 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABCS and MOO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ABCS vs. MOO - Dividend Comparison
ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than MOO's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF | 1.37% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MOO VanEck Agribusiness ETF | 2.13% | 2.47% | 3.41% | 2.93% | 2.15% | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.26% | 1.69% | 1.44% | 2.14% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
ABCS vs. MOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum MOO drawdown of -69.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and MOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABCS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.52% | -69.53% | +49.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -11.46% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -13.01% | +6.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -16.99% | +13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 3.09% | +0.39% |
Volatility
ABCS vs. MOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is 4.62%, while VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that ABCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABCS | MOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 6.00% | -1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 10.81% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.25% | 17.03% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 17.09% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 18.20% | -0.71% |