PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCS vs. GSEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABCS vs. GSEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than GSEU's 5.62% return.


ABCS

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.28%
YTD
6.97%
6M
7.94%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSEU

1D
-1.00%
1M
2.97%
YTD
5.62%
6M
9.09%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCS vs. GSEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
6.97%7.95%14.47%1.97%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
5.62%35.70%2.00%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCS and GSEU is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023

0.62

The correlation between ABCS and GSEU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

ABCS vs. GSEU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ABCS
GSEU

Financial Services

21.3%
24.7%

Healthcare

14.7%
13.1%

Technology

14.0%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
6.6%

Industrials

10.9%
19.9%

Energy

6.5%
4.4%

Real Estate

5.0%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
8.4%

Utilities

3.5%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
5.0%

Communication Services

2.0%
4.6%

Financial Services

ABCS
21.3%
GSEU
24.7%

Healthcare

ABCS
14.7%
GSEU
13.1%

Technology

ABCS
14.0%
GSEU
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ABCS
13.7%
GSEU
6.6%

Industrials

ABCS
10.9%
GSEU
19.9%

Energy

ABCS
6.5%
GSEU
4.4%

Real Estate

ABCS
5.0%
GSEU
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

ABCS
4.8%
GSEU
8.4%

Utilities

ABCS
3.5%
GSEU
4.8%

Basic Materials

ABCS
3.5%
GSEU
5.0%

Communication Services

ABCS
2.0%
GSEU
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABCS vs. GSEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCS
ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GSEU
GSEU Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GSEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSEU Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GSEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCS vs. GSEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABCSGSEUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.16

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.68

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

1.47

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.39

5.54

+0.85

ABCS vs. GSEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the GSEU Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCS and GSEU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABCSGSEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.16

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.52

+0.24

Drawdowns

ABCS vs. GSEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum GSEU drawdown of -35.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and GSEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCSGSEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-35.71%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-11.90%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-2.16%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-6.60%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.16%

-0.52%

Volatility

ABCS vs. GSEU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is 2.66%, while Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF (GSEU) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that ABCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSEU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABCSGSEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

5.58%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

12.48%

-3.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.60%

15.13%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

17.14%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.09%

18.11%

-1.02%

ABCS vs. GSEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GSEU's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ABCS vs. GSEU - Dividend Comparison

ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than GSEU's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
1.26%1.37%1.39%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSEU
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity ETF
2.58%2.72%2.35%3.41%3.34%2.71%1.84%3.69%3.40%2.51%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABCS and GSEU have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSEU has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to ABCS (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCS dropped -20.52% vs GSEU's -35.71%.

On 1-year performance, GSEU leads with 17.47% vs 16.85% for ABCS. On fees, GSEU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GSEU has performed better with a 17.47% return vs 16.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSEU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for ABCS.

GSEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 1.26% for ABCS.

ABCS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while GSEU is Europe Equities. ABCS tracks BNY Mellon ABC Index, while GSEU tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Europe Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ABCS and 0.25% for GSEU.

ABCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABCS and GSEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer