ABCS vs. BBLU

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABCS (Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF) and BBLU (Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABCS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the BNY Mellon ABC Index, while BBLU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. ABCS is passively managed, while BBLU is actively managed. Over the past year, ABCS returned 16.85% vs 29.32% for BBLU. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABCS charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBLU.

Performance

ABCS vs. BBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than BBLU's 10.22% return.

ABCS

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 16.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBLU

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.85%
• YTD: 10.22%
• 6M: 10.38%
• 1Y: 29.32%
• 3Y*: 23.09%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCS vs. BBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	6.97%	7.95%	14.47%	1.97%
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	10.22%	18.40%	27.47%	1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCS and BBLU is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.65

The correlation between ABCS and BBLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

ABCS vs. BBLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ABCS	BBLU
Financial Services	21.3%	15.9%
Healthcare	14.7%	12.5%
Technology	14.0%	29.3%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	9.8%
Industrials	10.9%	2.1%
Energy	6.5%	6.1%
Real Estate	5.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	9.6%
Utilities	3.5%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	-
Communication Services	2.0%	14.6%

Return for Risk

ABCS vs. BBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCS

ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 38
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

BBLU

BBLU Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
BBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCS vs. BBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABCS	BBLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.63	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.72	-1.83
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.46	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	4.08	-2.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	16.28	-9.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABCS vs. BBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BBLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCS and BBLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABCS	BBLU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	2.63	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.81	-1.04

Drawdowns

ABCS vs. BBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, which is greater than BBLU's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and BBLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABCS	BBLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.52%	-17.20%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	-7.22%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.83%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-1.98%	-1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	1.81%	+0.83%

Volatility

ABCS vs. BBLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is 2.66%, while Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF (BBLU) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that ABCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABCS	BBLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.82%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	7.88%	+1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	11.20%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	14.53%	+2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	14.53%	+2.56%

ABCS vs. BBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLU's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ABCS vs. BBLU - Dividend Comparison

ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than BBLU's 1.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	1.26%	1.37%	1.39%	0.02%	0.00%
BBLU Ea Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF	1.14%	1.25%	1.39%	1.68%	32.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABCS and BBLU in my portfolio?

ABCS and BBLU have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABCS or BBLU?

BBLU has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to ABCS (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCS dropped -20.52% vs BBLU's -17.20%.

Which ETF is better, ABCS or BBLU?

On 1-year performance, BBLU leads with 29.32% vs 16.85% for ABCS. On fees, BBLU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABCS or BBLU?

Over the 1-year period, BBLU has performed better with a 29.32% return vs 16.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABCS or BBLU?

BBLU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for ABCS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABCS or BBLU?

ABCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.14% for BBLU.

What is the main difference between ABCS and BBLU?

ABCS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while BBLU is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ABCS and 0.15% for BBLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.