PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in ABC arbitrage SA (ABCA.PA) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCA.PA achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than LDO.MI's 3.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ABCA.PA has underperformed LDO.MI with an annualized return of 4.33%, while LDO.MI has yielded a comparatively higher 18.81% annualized return.


ABCA.PA

1D
0.57%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.19%
1Y
-11.51%
3Y*
1.96%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
4.33%

LDO.MI

1D
-2.81%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
3.48%
6M
8.86%
1Y
-5.58%
3Y*
71.01%
5Y*
49.55%
10Y*
18.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABCA.PA
ABC arbitrage SA
0.37%19.60%6.72%-19.95%-4.30%6.70%13.63%17.74%2.70%-9.27%
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
3.48%91.71%75.81%87.64%29.81%6.60%-42.19%38.03%-21.39%-24.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCA.PA and LDO.MI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 1999

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCA.PA
ABCA.PA Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ABCA.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCA.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCA.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCA.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCA.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

LDO.MI
LDO.MI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDO.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABC arbitrage SA (ABCA.PA) and Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABCA.PALDO.MIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.01

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.23

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-0.49

-0.53

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCA.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the LDO.MI Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCA.PA and LDO.MI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABCA.PALDO.MIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.62

-0.14

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.38

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.49

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.18

+0.10

Drawdowns

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCA.PA drawdown since its inception was -89.34%, roughly equal to the maximum LDO.MI drawdown of -90.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCA.PA and LDO.MI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCA.PALDO.MIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.34%

-90.12%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.71%

-23.76%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.00%

-23.76%

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.12%

-33.70%

-13.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.12%

-73.16%

+26.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.01%

-20.84%

+7.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.26%

-52.88%

+29.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.31%

11.51%

-0.20%

Volatility

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ABC arbitrage SA (ABCA.PA) is 4.13%, while Leonardo S.p.A. (LDO.MI) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that ABCA.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDO.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABCA.PALDO.MIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

11.81%

-7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.67%

29.78%

-14.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

41.26%

-22.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.84%

35.64%

-16.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.80%

37.74%

-18.94%

Dividends

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Dividend Comparison

ABCA.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than LDO.MI's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABCA.PA
ABC arbitrage SA
6.39%6.30%6.26%8.53%6.20%8.12%4.55%6.42%6.58%3.82%6.55%7.80%
LDO.MI
Leonardo S.p.A.
1.02%1.06%1.08%0.94%1.74%0.00%2.37%1.34%1.82%1.41%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ABCA.PA vs. LDO.MI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ABC arbitrage SA and Leonardo S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ABCA.PA and LDO.MI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABCA.PA and LDO.MI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer