ABBV vs. FLJH
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) is a stock, while FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) is Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Over the past 5 years, ABBV returned 18.94%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for FLJH. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 18.85% return.
ABBV
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 23.06%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.94%
- 10Y*
- 19.10%
FLJH
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 45.89%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.54%
- 10Y*
- —
ABBV vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 1.30% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 4.77% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 18.85% | 25.26% | 25.89% | 36.02% | -2.75% | 12.68% | 10.65% | 20.34% | -14.66% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and FLJH is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ABBV and FLJH shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
FLJH
ABBV vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABBV | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.45 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 4.20 | -2.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 16.28 | -13.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and FLJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -31.51% | -13.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -10.80% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -20.39% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -20.39% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -1.30% | -3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -5.30% | -5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 2.78% | +4.97% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 5.20%. This indicates that ABBV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | FLJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 5.20% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 14.09% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.31% | 18.44% | +5.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 18.61% | +4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 19.84% | +5.89% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than FLJH's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.96% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF | 3.28% | 3.90% | 5.06% | 25.59% | 26.67% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.92% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and FLJH have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to FLJH (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs FLJH's -31.51%.
FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and FLJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer