PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AAXJ vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AAXJ vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ returned 10.34%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CRAK. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAXJ charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAXJ achieves a 26.46% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 29.26% return. Over the past 10 years, AAXJ has underperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 10.34%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.

AAXJ

1D
0.46%
1M
0.61%
YTD
26.46%
6M
29.76%
1Y
48.69%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
6.41%
10Y*
10.34%

CRAK

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
29.26%
6M
26.17%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF		26.46%31.53%10.41%4.79%-20.35%-5.73%23.35%17.93%-15.04%41.76%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		29.26%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%10.90%-11.22%9.15%-10.46%49.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AAXJ and CRAK is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between AAXJ and CRAK has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
AAXJ
CRAK

Technology

49.4%

-

Financial Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%

-

Industrials

7.3%
4.0%

Communication Services

5.9%

-

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.2%

Healthcare

2.6%

-

Energy

2.2%
98.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.6%

-

Real Estate

1.4%

-

Technology

AAXJ
49.4%
CRAK

-

Financial Services

AAXJ
15.8%
CRAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

AAXJ
8.9%
CRAK

-

Industrials

AAXJ
7.3%
CRAK
4.0%

Communication Services

AAXJ
5.9%
CRAK

-

Basic Materials

AAXJ
3.1%
CRAK
1.2%

Healthcare

AAXJ
2.6%
CRAK

-

Energy

AAXJ
2.2%
CRAK
98.8%

Consumer Defensive

AAXJ
2.0%
CRAK

-

Utilities

AAXJ
1.6%
CRAK

-

Real Estate

AAXJ
1.4%
CRAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

Often compared with AAXJ:
AAXJ vs. VPLAAXJ vs. IEMGAAXJ vs. VWOAAXJ vs. BBAXAAXJ vs. EPPAAXJ vs. CQQQAAXJ vs. THD
Often compared with CRAK:
CRAK vs. XLECRAK vs. OIHCRAK vs. VDECRAK vs. IEOCRAK vs. USAICRAK vs. EINCCRAK vs. AMLP

Return for Risk

AAXJ vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AAXJ
AAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
AAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AAXJCRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.11
2.98

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
3.91

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

6.49

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.55

17.24

-4.69

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAXJ and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAXJ drawdown since its inception was -49.37%, smaller than the maximum CRAK drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAXJ and CRAK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AAXJCRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.37%

-58.80%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.66%

-8.57%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.74%

-35.61%

+15.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.64%

-35.61%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.52%

-58.80%

+14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-6.68%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.01%

-12.48%

-1.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

3.22%

+0.49%

Volatility

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 5.81%. This indicates that AAXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AAXJCRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.46%

5.81%

+5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.71%

14.72%

+4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.12%

18.66%

+3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

20.67%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.42%

22.17%

-1.75%

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAXJ has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAXJ vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

AAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than CRAK's 1.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAXJ
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF		1.43%1.81%1.86%1.95%1.74%2.21%1.06%1.83%2.10%1.99%1.77%2.44%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		1.56%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

AAXJ and CRAK have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAXJ has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to CRAK (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAXJ dropped -49.37% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

On 10-year performance, CRAK leads with 13.50% vs 10.34% for AAXJ. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CRAK has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 10.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.

CRAK has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.43% for AAXJ.

AAXJ is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while CRAK is Energy Equities. AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for AAXJ and 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAXJ and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer