AAUTX vs. TMAAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX).
AAUTX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Oct 29, 1999. TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005.
Performance
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund | 2.50% | 19.31% | 21.28% | 12.63% | -4.89% | 31.65% | 4.31% | 23.66% | -8.82% | 12.59% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -2.02% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUTX achieves a 2.50% return, which is significantly higher than TMAAX's -2.02% return. Over the past 10 years, AAUTX has outperformed TMAAX with an annualized return of 12.04%, while TMAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
AAUTX
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -4.68%
- YTD
- 2.50%
- 6M
- 7.42%
- 1Y
- 20.15%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.04%
TMAAX
- 1D
- 2.28%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUTX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAAX's 1.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AAUTX vs. TMAAX — Risk / Return Rank
AAUTX
TMAAX
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAUTX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.61 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.24 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 1.58 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.16 | 7.30 | +0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAUTX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.09 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.55 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUTX and TMAAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Dividend Comparison
AAUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.15%, less than TMAAX's 7.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund | 5.15% | 5.28% | 16.25% | 3.22% | 6.12% | 7.62% | 6.33% | 1.52% | 7.44% | 1.08% | 1.18% | 0.00% |
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.44% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
Drawdowns
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUTX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, which is greater than TMAAX's maximum drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUTX and TMAAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUTX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.34% | -50.54% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -9.88% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.71% | -26.55% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.88% | -26.99% | -11.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.70% | -5.44% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -7.41% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 2.15% | +0.43% |
Volatility
AAUTX vs. TMAAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) is 4.21%, while Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that AAUTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AAUTX | TMAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.83% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 7.98% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 14.13% | +1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.91% | 13.85% | +2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.82% | 13.29% | +4.53% |