PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAUTX vs. LUBIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUTX achieves a 12.58% return, which is significantly higher than LUBIX's 0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AAUTX has outperformed LUBIX with an annualized return of 12.85%, while LUBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.68% annualized return.


AAUTX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.77%
YTD
12.58%
6M
12.29%
1Y
28.83%
3Y*
20.74%
5Y*
14.35%
10Y*
12.85%

LUBIX

1D
0.18%
1M
0.84%
YTD
0.40%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
2.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAUTX
Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund
12.58%19.31%21.28%12.63%-4.89%31.65%4.31%23.66%-8.82%12.59%
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
0.40%7.57%2.93%8.11%-16.07%-0.76%11.61%13.20%-2.60%5.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUTX and LUBIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996

-0.08

The correlation between AAUTX and LUBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAUTX vs. LUBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAUTX
AAUTX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AAUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
AAUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

LUBIX
LUBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
LUBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
LUBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAUTXLUBIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.22

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

1.62

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

5.20

+11.88

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAUTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the LUBIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAUTX and LUBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUTX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, which is greater than LUBIX's maximum drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUTX and LUBIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAUTXLUBIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.34%

-23.52%

-30.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-3.22%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-6.35%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.71%

-22.12%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.88%

-22.12%

-16.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-1.05%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-3.79%

-4.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.00%

+0.69%

Volatility

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to Thrivent Income Fund (LUBIX) at 1.25%. This indicates that AAUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LUBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAUTXLUBIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

1.25%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

3.12%

+5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

4.17%

+6.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.86%

6.41%

+9.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.80%

5.64%

+12.16%

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUTX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LUBIX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAUTX vs. LUBIX - Dividend Comparison

AAUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than LUBIX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAUTX
Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund
4.69%5.28%16.25%3.22%6.12%7.62%6.33%1.52%7.44%1.08%1.18%0.00%
LUBIX
Thrivent Income Fund
4.30%4.20%4.13%3.06%3.30%4.18%5.21%3.42%3.44%2.99%3.16%3.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAUTX and LUBIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAUTX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to LUBIX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAUTX dropped -54.34% vs LUBIX's -23.52%.

AAUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAUTX and LUBIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer