AAUS vs. TOLZ
AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and TOLZ (ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while TOLZ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. AAUS is actively managed, while TOLZ is passively managed. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for TOLZ.
Performance
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 12.09% return.
AAUS
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOLZ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 6.59% | 10.11% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 12.09% | 2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUS and TOLZ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUS vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank
AAUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOLZ
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAUS | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum TOLZ drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and TOLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUS | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -39.33% | +30.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -2.45% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -6.61% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUS | TOLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 10.41% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 13.98% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 16.23% | -3.32% |
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAUS vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison
AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than TOLZ's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TOLZ ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF | 3.63% | 3.99% | 3.53% | 3.34% | 3.01% | 3.28% | 3.16% | 2.96% | 3.63% | 3.30% | 2.62% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUS and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TOLZ.
TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.35% for AAUS.
AAUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TOLZ is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.46% for TOLZ.
Find the right allocation for AAUS and TOLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer