AAUS vs. SCHB
AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AAUS is actively managed, while SCHB is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
AAUS vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's 11.28% return.
AAUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 11.12%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
AAUS vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 9.48% | 9.66% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 11.28% | 7.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUS and SCHB is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUS vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
AAUS
SCHB
AAUS vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAUS | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.90 | 0.83 | +1.07 |
Drawdowns
AAUS vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUS | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -35.27% | +26.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.72% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -4.12% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility
AAUS vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUS | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 12.12% | +0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 17.24% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.45% | 18.32% | -5.87% |
AAUS vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AAUS vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SCHB's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, AAUS and SCHB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AAUS.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.34% for AAUS.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.03% for SCHB.
Find the right allocation for AAUS and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer