AAUS vs. DJUN
AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AAUS is actively managed, while DJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.
Performance
AAUS vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.29% return.
AAUS
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -1.70%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DJUN
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 6M
- 3.23%
- 1Y
- 10.33%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- —
AAUS vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 6.59% | 10.11% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 3.29% | 4.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUS and DJUN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUS vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank
AAUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DJUN
AAUS vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAUS | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 20.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAUS vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum DJUN drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and DJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUS | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -11.96% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -0.71% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -1.58% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.51% | — |
Volatility
AAUS vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUS | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 4.51% | +8.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 8.52% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 8.03% | +4.88% |
AAUS vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAUS vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison
AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.35% | 0.37% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUS and DJUN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
AAUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.85% for DJUN.
Find the right allocation for AAUS and DJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer