PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAUS vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAUS vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


AAUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.93%
YTD
9.48%
6M
9.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUS vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAUS and AFOS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAUS vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAUS vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAUSAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.90

4.35

-2.44

Drawdowns

AAUS vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAUSAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-11.52%

+2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.29%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-1.37%

+0.06%

Volatility

AAUS vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAUSAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

20.19%

-7.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

20.19%

-7.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.45%

20.19%

-7.74%

AAUS vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAUS vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AAUS and AFOS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

AAUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAUS and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer