AAUM vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAUM (Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAUM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

AAUM vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUM achieves a -15.70% return, which is significantly lower than GABF's -4.77% return.

AAUM

• 1D: 4.05%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: -15.70%
• 6M: -11.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: -4.77%
• 6M: -4.12%
• 1Y: -1.19%
• 3Y*: 21.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUM vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF	-15.70%	1.19%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-4.77%	-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUM and GABF is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

AAUM vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUM vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAUM	GABF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.76	0.90	-1.66

Drawdowns

AAUM vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUM drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUM and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUM	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-20.86%	-7.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.34%	-9.45%	-10.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-4.86%	-7.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.29%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAUM	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.91%	17.53%	+10.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.91%	20.57%	+7.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	20.57%	+7.34%

AAUM vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAUM vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

AAUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than GABF's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF	0.89%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.06%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUM and GABF in my portfolio?

AAUM and GABF have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAUM or GABF?

On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAUM or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AAUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAUM or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.89% for AAUM.

What is the main difference between AAUM and GABF?

They also come from different issuers: Tema ETFs and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AAUM and 0.10% for GABF.