PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Montage Gold Corp (MAU.TO) and i-80 Gold Corp (IAU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAU.TO achieves a 58.40% return, which is significantly higher than IAU.TO's 4.95% return.


MAU.TO

1D
-5.50%
1M
17.05%
YTD
58.40%
6M
81.98%
1Y
234.40%
3Y*
190.25%
5Y*
75.13%
10Y*

IAU.TO

1D
-5.36%
1M
4.43%
YTD
4.95%
6M
25.44%
1Y
178.95%
3Y*
-11.03%
5Y*
-4.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MAU.TO
Montage Gold Corp
58.40%375.00%192.96%5.97%4.69%-5.88%
IAU.TO
i-80 Gold Corp
4.95%192.75%-70.39%-38.36%22.33%-35.63%

Correlation

The correlation between MAU.TO and IAU.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021

0.28

Over the past year, MAU.TO and IAU.TO have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MAU.TO:

CA$5.70B

IAU.TO:

CA$1.77B

EPS

MAU.TO:

-CA$0.11

IAU.TO:

-CA$0.27

PB Ratio

MAU.TO:

51.74

IAU.TO:

5.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

MAU.TO:

CA$0.00

IAU.TO:

CA$127.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MAU.TO:

-CA$994.60K

IAU.TO:

-CA$22.55M

EBITDA (TTM)

MAU.TO:

-CA$36.56M

IAU.TO:

-CA$99.58M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAU.TO
MAU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
MAU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MAU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU.TO
IAU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
IAU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Montage Gold Corp (MAU.TO) and i-80 Gold Corp (IAU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAU.TOIAU.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.12

2.82

+1.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.87

2.95

+0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

9.16

4.71

+4.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

29.52

12.21

+17.31

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is higher than the IAU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAU.TO and IAU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAU.TOIAU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

2.82

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.40

-0.06

+1.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

-0.21

+1.31

Drawdowns

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAU.TO drawdown since its inception was -57.89%, smaller than the maximum IAU.TO drawdown of -91.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAU.TO and IAU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAU.TOIAU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.89%

-91.25%

+33.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.76%

-38.25%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-84.09%

+58.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.47%

-87.90%

+38.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

-62.14%

+54.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-59.76%

+34.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

14.72%

-6.72%

Volatility

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Volatility Comparison

Montage Gold Corp (MAU.TO) has a higher volatility of 19.97% compared to i-80 Gold Corp (IAU.TO) at 16.43%. This indicates that MAU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAU.TOIAU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.97%

16.43%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.37%

45.65%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.30%

63.79%

-6.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.90%

67.46%

-13.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.41%

70.57%

-16.16%

Dividends

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAU.TO nor IAU.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MAU.TO vs. IAU.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Montage Gold Corp and i-80 Gold Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M202220232024202520260
52.26M
(MAU.TO) Total Revenue
(IAU.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MAU.TO and IAU.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAU.TO and IAU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer