AASG.L vs. CP9G.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L).
AASG.L and CP9G.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AASG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. CP9G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Feb 14, 2018. Both AASG.L and CP9G.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD | 3.59% | 23.83% | 14.04% | 0.69% | -11.51% | -4.50% | 24.04% | 14.10% | -10.84% | 30.20% |
CP9G.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 3.94% | 5.89% | 0.85% | -0.56% | -1.42% | 6.76% | 0.48% | 13.35% | -5.17% | 14.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AASG.L achieves a 3.59% return, which is significantly lower than CP9G.L's 3.94% return. Over the past 10 years, AASG.L has outperformed CP9G.L with an annualized return of 9.47%, while CP9G.L has yielded a comparatively lower 6.01% annualized return.
AASG.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
CP9G.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 3.94%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 6.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CP9G.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L — Risk / Return Rank
AASG.L
CP9G.L
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AASG.L | CP9G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 0.76 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.11 | 1.11 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 1.56 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.25 | 5.02 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AASG.L | CP9G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 0.76 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.21 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.38 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.42 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between AASG.L and CP9G.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AASG.L nor CP9G.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than CP9G.L's maximum drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASG.L and CP9G.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASG.L | CP9G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.12% | -32.32% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.46% | -8.26% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.57% | -18.14% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.12% | -32.32% | -1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.81% | -4.17% | -5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -6.09% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.57% | +0.66% |
Volatility
AASG.L vs. CP9G.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a higher volatility of 7.40% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) at 6.29%. This indicates that AASG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP9G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AASG.L | CP9G.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 6.29% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 9.94% | +3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.01% | 14.59% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 13.87% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 15.72% | +2.59% |