AASCX vs. JNVSX
AASCX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund) and JNVSX (Jensen Quality Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AASCX returned 10.75%/yr vs 10.78%/yr for JNVSX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AASCX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for JNVSX.
Performance
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AASCX achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than JNVSX's 1.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AASCX having a 10.75% annualized return and JNVSX not far ahead at 10.78%.
AASCX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 14.16%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
JNVSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- -1.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.78%
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund | 18.13% | 4.43% | 14.60% | 13.65% | -17.85% | 27.70% | 21.68% | 24.51% | -10.73% | 8.73% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 1.51% | -2.58% | 9.40% | 18.58% | -15.83% | 60.71% | 14.79% | 27.58% | -9.03% | 15.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AASCX and JNVSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AASCX and JNVSX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AASCX vs. JNVSX — Risk / Return Rank
AASCX
JNVSX
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AASCX | JNVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.98 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.24 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | -0.44 | +8.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than JNVSX's maximum drawdown of -34.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and JNVSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASCX | JNVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -34.52% | -22.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -10.42% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -17.43% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | -24.56% | -8.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.67% | -34.52% | -6.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -7.15% | +6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -5.20% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 5.71% | -3.20% |
Volatility
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) has a higher volatility of 4.36% compared to Jensen Quality Value Fund (JNVSX) at 3.78%. This indicates that AASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNVSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AASCX | JNVSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 3.78% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 9.62% | +1.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 12.93% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 20.48% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.78% | 19.17% | +1.61% |
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than JNVSX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AASCX vs. JNVSX - Dividend Comparison
AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, more than JNVSX's 11.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund | 12.68% | 14.98% | 9.22% | 1.54% | 3.15% | 12.54% | 3.54% | 2.92% | 12.94% | 0.09% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
JNVSX Jensen Quality Value Fund | 11.09% | 11.31% | 6.15% | 0.56% | 2.69% | 22.40% | 1.27% | 5.13% | 6.15% | 4.14% | 1.34% | 17.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AASCX and JNVSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AASCX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to JNVSX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASCX dropped -56.55% vs JNVSX's -34.52%.
AASCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AASCX and JNVSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer