AASCX vs. FTHMX
AASCX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund) and FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, AASCX returned 21.52% vs 26.16% for FTHMX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AASCX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for FTHMX.
Performance
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AASCX achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than FTHMX's 15.11% return.
AASCX
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 6M
- 14.04%
- 1Y
- 21.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
FTHMX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 15.11%
- 6M
- 13.31%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund | 16.14% | 4.43% | 14.60% | 8.97% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 15.11% | 12.89% | 12.48% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AASCX and FTHMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between AASCX and FTHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AASCX vs. FTHMX — Risk / Return Rank
AASCX
FTHMX
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AASCX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 3.99 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 13.83 | -5.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASCX drawdown since its inception was -56.55%, which is greater than FTHMX's maximum drawdown of -20.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASCX and FTHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASCX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.55% | -20.45% | -36.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -6.33% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -1.28% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -2.99% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 1.82% | +0.69% |
Volatility
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund (AASCX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) at 4.00%. This indicates that AASCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AASCX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 4.00% | +0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 9.79% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 12.96% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 15.42% | +5.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 15.42% | +5.42% |
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHMX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
AASCX vs. FTHMX - Dividend Comparison
AASCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.90%, more than FTHMX's 0.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASCX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund | 12.90% | 14.98% | 9.22% | 1.54% | 3.15% | 12.54% | 3.54% | 2.92% | 12.94% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 0.28% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, AASCX and FTHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AASCX has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to FTHMX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASCX dropped -56.55% vs FTHMX's -20.45%.
FTHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AASCX and FTHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer