PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPX vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 5.36% return.


AAPX

1D
-3.52%
1M
24.03%
YTD
21.23%
6M
8.76%
1Y
97.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
21.23%-4.95%56.69%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.36%15.42%13.79%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and XTJL is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.51

The correlation between AAPX and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

AAPX vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AAPX
XTJL

Technology

100.0%
36.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.9%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

AAPX
100.0%
XTJL
36.2%

Basic Materials

AAPX

-

XTJL
1.8%

Communication Services

AAPX

-

XTJL
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AAPX

-

XTJL
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

AAPX

-

XTJL
4.9%

Energy

AAPX

-

XTJL
3.5%

Financial Services

AAPX

-

XTJL
11.9%

Healthcare

AAPX

-

XTJL
8.4%

Industrials

AAPX

-

XTJL
8.1%

Real Estate

AAPX

-

XTJL
1.9%

Utilities

AAPX

-

XTJL
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.46

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.07

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

17.37

-9.62

AAPX vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.12

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.65

-0.13

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-23.24%

-35.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-5.12%

-25.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

0.00%

-3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.36%

-4.04%

-15.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

0.90%

+11.76%

Volatility

AAPX vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that AAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPXXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.21%

0.33%

+10.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.05%

5.72%

+26.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.99%

7.43%

+37.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.62%

15.22%

+39.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.62%

15.22%

+39.40%

AAPX vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPX vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.55%0.67%21.46%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPX and XTJL have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPX has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 97.74% vs 15.64% for XTJL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 97.74% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.79% for XTJL.

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPX and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer