AAPX vs. USO
AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. AAPX is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPX returned 97.74% vs 101.55% for USO. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
AAPX vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 103.67% return.
AAPX
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 97.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 103.67%
- 6M
- 99.35%
- 1Y
- 101.55%
- 3Y*
- 29.98%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
AAPX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 21.23% | -4.95% | 56.69% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 103.67% | -8.46% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPX and USO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | -0.05 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between AAPX and USO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.05 to -0.26, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
AAPX
USO
AAPX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 5.01 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 9.42 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.31 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | -0.18 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
AAPX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -98.19% | +39.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -20.39% | -9.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -85.01% | +81.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -75.30% | +55.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 10.82% | +1.84% |
Volatility
AAPX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 11.21%, while United States Oil Fund LP (USO) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 14.87% | -3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.05% | 38.23% | -6.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.99% | 44.20% | +0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 36.06% | +18.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 39.00% | +15.62% |
AAPX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPX and USO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USO has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to AAPX (11.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 1-year performance, USO leads with 101.55% vs 97.74% for AAPX. On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 11.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USO has performed better with a 101.55% return vs 97.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
AAPX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and USCF. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.86% for USO.
USO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPX and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer