AAPX vs. RBLU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. AAPX is actively managed, while RBLU is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPX returned 82.26% vs -88.74% for RBLU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.

Performance

AAPX vs. RBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than RBLU's -75.81% return.

AAPX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -11.09%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 82.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBLU

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: -5.75%
• YTD: -75.81%
• 6M: -76.46%
• 1Y: -88.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. RBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	7.58%	8.34%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	-75.81%	23.90%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and RBLU is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

AAPX vs. RBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 57
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RBLU

RBLU Risk / Return Rank: 2
RBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
RBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
RBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. RBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPX	RBLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-0.72	+2.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	-1.47	+3.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.82	+0.50
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	-0.94	+3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	-1.35	+7.73

AAPX vs. RBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the RBLU Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and RBLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. RBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum RBLU drawdown of -94.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and RBLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPX	RBLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-94.76%	+36.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.12%	-94.76%	+64.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.39%	-93.24%	+78.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-44.91%	+25.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.93%	65.53%	-52.60%

Volatility

AAPX vs. RBLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 14.05%, while T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU) has a volatility of 36.78%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPX	RBLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.05%	36.78%	-22.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.55%	102.66%	-69.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.55%	122.99%	-77.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.44%	118.25%	-63.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.44%	118.25%	-63.81%

AAPX vs. RBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAPX and RBLU have an expense ratio of 1.05%.

Dividends

AAPX vs. RBLU - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than RBLU's 5.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.62%	0.67%	21.46%
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF	5.35%	1.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPX and RBLU in my portfolio?

AAPX and RBLU have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPX or RBLU?

RBLU has higher volatility (36.78%) compared to AAPX (14.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs RBLU's -94.76%.

Which ETF is better, AAPX or RBLU?

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 82.26% vs -88.74% for RBLU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 14.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPX or RBLU?

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 82.26% return vs -88.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPX or RBLU?

AAPX and RBLU have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPX or RBLU?

RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 0.62% for AAPX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.