PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. PLTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPX vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 22.31% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -47.61% return.


AAPX

1D
0.89%
1M
18.76%
YTD
22.31%
6M
12.90%
1Y
100.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTG

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.26%
YTD
-47.61%
6M
-49.25%
1Y
-22.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and PLTG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTG
PLTG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PLTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPXPLTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.05

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-0.32

+3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

-0.55

+8.51

AAPX vs. PLTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the PLTG Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and PLTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPXPLTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

-0.22

+2.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.02

+0.54

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum PLTG drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and PLTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXPLTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-69.02%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-69.02%

+38.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

-64.40%

+61.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.33%

-30.48%

+11.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.66%

40.34%

-27.68%

Volatility

AAPX vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 10.31%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a volatility of 33.39%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPXPLTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.31%

33.39%

-23.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.00%

77.78%

-45.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.98%

103.03%

-58.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.58%

105.81%

-51.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.58%

105.81%

-51.23%

AAPX vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPX vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PLTG's 34.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.54%0.67%21.46%
PLTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF
34.62%18.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPX and PLTG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTG has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to AAPX (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs PLTG's -69.02%.

On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 100.47% vs -22.13% for PLTG. On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 10.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 100.47% return vs -22.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.62%, compared with 0.54% for AAPX.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.75% for PLTG.

AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPX and PLTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer