AAPX vs. PLTG
AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and PLTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPX returned 100.47% vs -22.13% for PLTG. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PLTG.
Performance
AAPX vs. PLTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 22.31% return, which is significantly higher than PLTG's -47.61% return.
AAPX
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 18.76%
- YTD
- 22.31%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- 1Y
- 100.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTG
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- -47.61%
- 6M
- -49.25%
- 1Y
- -22.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX vs. PLTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 22.31% | 51.37% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | -47.61% | 86.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPX and PLTG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPX vs. PLTG — Risk / Return Rank
AAPX
PLTG
AAPX vs. PLTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPX | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.05 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | -0.32 | +3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | -0.55 | +8.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPX | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | -0.22 | +2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.02 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
AAPX vs. PLTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum PLTG drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and PLTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPX | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -69.02% | +10.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -69.02% | +38.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.66% | -64.40% | +61.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.33% | -30.48% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 40.34% | -27.68% |
Volatility
AAPX vs. PLTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 10.31%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG) has a volatility of 33.39%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPX | PLTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.31% | 33.39% | -23.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.00% | 77.78% | -45.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.98% | 103.03% | -58.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.58% | 105.81% | -51.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.58% | 105.81% | -51.23% |
AAPX vs. PLTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPX vs. PLTG - Dividend Comparison
AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than PLTG's 34.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.54% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
PLTG Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF | 34.62% | 18.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPX and PLTG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTG has higher volatility (33.39%) compared to AAPX (10.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs PLTG's -69.02%.
On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 100.47% vs -22.13% for PLTG. On fees, PLTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 10.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 100.47% return vs -22.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.
PLTG has the higher dividend yield at 34.62%, compared with 0.54% for AAPX.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.75% for PLTG.
AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPX and PLTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer