AAPX vs. MUU

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AAPX is actively managed, while MUU is passively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

AAPX vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AAPX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -11.09%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 6M: 6.15%
• 1Y: 82.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MUU

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	-2.67%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	-12.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and MUU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2026	0.31

Return for Risk

AAPX vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 57
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

MUU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPX	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.38	—	—

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPX	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-26.63%	-31.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.39%	-26.63%	+12.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-12.91%	-6.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAPX	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.55%	263.57%	-218.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.44%	263.57%	-209.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.44%	263.57%	-209.13%

AAPX vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPX vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than MUU's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.62%	0.67%	21.46%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPX and MUU in my portfolio?

AAPX and MUU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAPX or MUU?

On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPX or MUU?

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPX or MUU?

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.23% for MUU.

What is the main difference between AAPX and MUU?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 1.01% for MUU.