AAPX vs. IFED
AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AAPX is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. Over the past year, AAPX returned 97.74% vs 1.97% for IFED. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
AAPX vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -3.52% return.
AAPX
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 24.03%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 97.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 21.23% | -4.95% | 56.69% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.52% | 15.02% | 22.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPX and IFED is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPX vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
AAPX
IFED
AAPX vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.04 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 0.14 | +3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 0.34 | +7.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 0.12 | +2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.65 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
AAPX vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and IFED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.55% | -22.36% | -36.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.12% | -14.65% | -15.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.52% | -5.50% | +1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.36% | -5.84% | -13.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 5.75% | +6.91% |
Volatility
AAPX vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) has a higher volatility of 11.21% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.50%. This indicates that AAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPX | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 4.50% | +6.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.05% | 12.86% | +19.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.99% | 16.21% | +28.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 19.88% | +34.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.62% | 19.88% | +34.74% |
AAPX vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPX vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.55% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPX and IFED have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPX has higher volatility (11.21%) compared to IFED (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs IFED's -22.36%.
On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 97.74% vs 1.97% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 97.74% return vs 1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.45% for IFED.
AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPX and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer