AAPX vs. FUTG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) and FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPX charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FUTG.

Performance

AAPX vs. FUTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than FUTG's -75.53% return.

AAPX

• 1D: -3.52%
• 1M: 24.03%
• YTD: 21.23%
• 6M: 8.76%
• 1Y: 97.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUTG

• 1D: -11.10%
• 1M: -70.24%
• YTD: -75.53%
• 6M: -77.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. FUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	21.23%	16.22%
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	-75.53%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and FUTG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025	0.21

Return for Risk

AAPX vs. FUTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX

AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 59
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. FUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAPX	FUTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAPX	FUTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	-0.66	+1.18

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. FUTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum FUTG drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and FUTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPX	FUTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.55%	-86.19%	+27.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.52%	-84.29%	+80.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.36%	-40.35%	+20.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAPX	FUTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.21%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.99%	136.01%	-91.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.62%	136.01%	-81.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.62%	136.01%	-81.39%

AAPX vs. FUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPX vs. FUTG - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF	0.55%	0.67%	21.46%
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPX and FUTG in my portfolio?

AAPX and FUTG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAPX or FUTG?

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPX or FUTG?

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPX or FUTG?

AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.

What is the main difference between AAPX and FUTG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.75% for FUTG.