AAPU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AAPU (Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. AAPU is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPU charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

AAPU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPU achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

AAPU

• 1D: -3.64%
• 1M: -4.76%
• 6M: 16.42%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 1Y: 93.91%
• 3Y*: 22.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.81%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares	$95.46M	$84.08M	$76.55M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M

AAPU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares	13.33%	1.92%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPU and LINT is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.07

AAPU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AAPU	LINT
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AAPU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPU

AAPU Risk / Return Rank: 74
AAPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AAPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
AAPU Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AAPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AAPU Martin Ratio Rank: 60

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares (AAPU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.45	—	—

Drawdowns

AAPU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPU drawdown since its inception was -58.61%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.61%	-69.02%	+10.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.19%	-62.23%	+41.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.30%	-24.07%	+6.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAPU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.65%	169.02%	-117.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.09%	169.02%	-118.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.09%	169.02%	-118.93%

AAPU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPU has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

AAPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, more than LINT's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPU Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares	7.90%	8.66%	14.58%	2.32%	0.79%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPU and LINT in my portfolio?

AAPU and LINT have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAPU or LINT?

On fees, AAPU is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPU or LINT?

AAPU is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPU or LINT?

AAPU has the higher dividend yield at 7.90%, compared with 0.74% for LINT.

What is the main difference between AAPU and LINT?

Their fees differ too: 0.96% for AAPU and 0.97% for LINT.