PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPR vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPR vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPR achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.


AAPR

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.68%
YTD
3.82%
6M
4.48%
1Y
9.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPR vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAPR and QQQY is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.76

The correlation between AAPR and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPR vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPR
AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPR vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPRQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.18

2.68

+1.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.21

3.37

+3.83

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.49

+0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.12

3.28

+8.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

62.99

13.95

+49.03

AAPR vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.18, which is higher than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPR and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPRQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.18

2.68

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.73

1.25

+0.48

Drawdowns

AAPR vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPR drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPR and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPRQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-19.05%

+13.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.81%

-11.14%

+10.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.36%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-2.91%

+2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

2.61%

-2.45%

Volatility

AAPR vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) is 0.68%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that AAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPRQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

4.21%

-3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

11.30%

-9.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

13.67%

-11.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.81%

14.75%

-9.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

14.75%

-9.94%

AAPR vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPR vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AAPR
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPR and QQQY have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to AAPR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPR dropped -5.99% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 9.83% for AAPR. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 9.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.

AAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AAPR and 0.99% for QQQY.

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPR and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer