AAPR vs. JPO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026) and JPO (YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPR returned 8.66% vs 16.86% for JPO. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for JPO.

Performance

AAPR vs. JPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AAPR having a 3.28% return and JPO slightly higher at 3.29%.

AAPR

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 3.28%
• 6M: 3.35%
• 1Y: 8.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPO

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 7.01%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 2.23%
• 1Y: 16.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPR vs. JPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026	3.28%	7.79%	6.33%
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	3.29%	22.26%	-0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPR and JPO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2024	0.39

Return for Risk

AAPR vs. JPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPR

AAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
AAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
AAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
AAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

JPO

JPO Risk / Return Rank: 25
JPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
JPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
JPO Omega Ratio Rank: 25
JPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
JPO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPR vs. JPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) and YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPR	JPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.53	0.89	+2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.73	1.25	+4.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.81	1.16	+0.64
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.02	1.19	+7.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	44.54	2.93	+41.60

AAPR vs. JPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is higher than the JPO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPR and JPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPR vs. JPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPR drawdown since its inception was -5.99%, smaller than the maximum JPO drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPR and JPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPR	JPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-24.80%	+18.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.96%	-14.24%	+13.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	0.00%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.45%	-4.56%	+4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.19%	5.76%	-5.57%

Volatility

AAPR vs. JPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026 (AAPR) is 1.06%, while YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF (JPO) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that AAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPR	JPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.06%	6.00%	-4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.85%	14.70%	-12.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.48%	19.13%	-16.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.80%	19.10%	-14.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.80%	19.10%	-14.30%

AAPR vs. JPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than JPO's 1.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPR vs. JPO - Dividend Comparison

AAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JPO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.87%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To April 2026	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JPO YieldMax JPM Option Income Strategy ETF	31.87%	34.13%	25.15%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPR and JPO in my portfolio?

AAPR and JPO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPR or JPO?

JPO has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to AAPR (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPR dropped -5.99% vs JPO's -24.80%.

Which ETF is better, AAPR or JPO?

On 1-year performance, JPO leads with 16.86% vs 8.66% for AAPR. On fees, AAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, AAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPR or JPO?

Over the 1-year period, JPO has performed better with a 16.86% return vs 8.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPR or JPO?

AAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.19% for JPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPR or JPO?

JPO has the higher dividend yield at 31.87%, compared with 0.00% for AAPR.

What is the main difference between AAPR and JPO?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AAPR and 1.19% for JPO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.