PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPL vs. UGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPL vs. UGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly higher than UGL's -12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed UGL with an annualized return of 29.36%, while UGL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.37% annualized return.


AAPL

1D
-1.52%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
7.29%
6M
4.81%
1Y
46.73%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
18.59%
10Y*
29.36%

UGL

1D
0.08%
1M
-20.27%
YTD
-12.66%
6M
-12.99%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
47.90%
5Y*
24.60%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. UGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAPL
Apple Inc
7.29%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-12.66%137.57%46.36%15.56%-7.59%-12.30%39.04%31.11%-8.02%22.50%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and UGL is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2008

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPL vs. UGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

UGL
UGL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGL Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. UGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPLUGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.16

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

0.71

+2.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

1.85

+6.62

AAPL vs. UGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the UGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and UGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. UGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than UGL's maximum drawdown of -75.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and UGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPLUGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.80%

-75.93%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-46.64%

+32.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

-46.64%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-46.64%

+13.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

-46.64%

+8.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.64%

-43.37%

+35.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.59%

-43.62%

+14.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

17.76%

-12.23%

Volatility

AAPL vs. UGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Apple Inc (AAPL) is 6.73%, while ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) has a volatility of 15.51%. This indicates that AAPL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPLUGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

15.51%

-8.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

48.64%

-32.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.64%

54.39%

-31.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.52%

36.61%

-9.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.92%

32.58%

-3.66%

Dividends

AAPL vs. UGL - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while UGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.36%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPL and UGL have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGL has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to AAPL (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs UGL's -75.93%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPL and UGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer