AAPL vs. FBGKX

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock, while FBGKX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, AAPL returned 30.70%/yr vs 21.16%/yr for FBGKX. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Apple Inc (AAPL) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPL achieves a 20.35% return, which is significantly higher than FBGKX's 12.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AAPL has outperformed FBGKX with an annualized return of 30.70%, while FBGKX has yielded a comparatively lower 21.16% annualized return.

AAPL

• 1D: -2.14%
• 1M: 9.59%
• 6M: 28.05%
• YTD: 20.35%
• 1Y: 55.26%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 18.17%
• 10Y*: 30.70%
• ALL TIME*: 19.46%

FBGKX

• 1D: -1.36%
• 1M: -5.94%
• 6M: 11.52%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 1Y: 25.59%
• 3Y*: 25.94%
• 5Y*: 14.59%
• 10Y*: 21.16%
• ALL TIME*: 15.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAPL Apple Inc	20.35%	9.05%	30.71%	49.01%	-26.40%	34.65%	82.31%	88.96%	-5.39%	48.46%
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	12.01%	19.99%	39.87%	55.76%	-38.40%	22.74%	62.35%	33.56%	1.11%	36.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPL and FBGKX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2008	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between AAPL and FBGKX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AAPL vs. FBGKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPL

AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 92
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FBGKX

FBGKX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FBGKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FBGKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FBGKX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FBGKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
FBGKX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Apple Inc (AAPL) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPL	FBGKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.32	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	1.84	+1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.23	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	2.05	+1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	7.96	+1.62

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPL Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the FBGKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPL and FBGKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPL drawdown since its inception was -81.80%, which is greater than FBGKX's maximum drawdown of -48.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPL and FBGKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPL	FBGKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.80%	-48.90%	-32.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.80%	-12.63%	-1.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.36%	-27.06%	-6.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.36%	-43.03%	+9.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.52%	-43.03%	+4.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-6.27%	+4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.54%	-8.33%	-21.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.78%	3.24%	+2.54%

Volatility

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Volatility Comparison

Apple Inc (AAPL) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K (FBGKX) at 6.79%. This indicates that AAPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPL	FBGKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.61%	6.79%	+3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.34%	15.64%	+3.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.55%	19.57%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.79%	25.18%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.08%	23.78%	+5.30%

Dividends

AAPL vs. FBGKX - Dividend Comparison

AAPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FBGKX's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAPL Apple Inc	0.32%	0.38%	0.40%	0.49%	0.70%	0.49%	0.61%	1.04%	1.79%	1.45%	1.93%	1.93%
FBGKX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund Class K	1.69%	1.89%	6.00%	0.93%	0.56%	8.77%	6.41%	3.70%	6.41%	4.26%	4.22%	5.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPL and FBGKX in my portfolio?

AAPL and FBGKX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPL or FBGKX?

AAPL has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to FBGKX (6.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPL dropped -81.80% vs FBGKX's -48.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.