AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L
AAPI.L (IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - AAPI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQO.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPI.L returned 19.57% vs 32.75% for QQQO.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.
Performance
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPI.L achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQQO.L's 15.53% return.
AAPI.L
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 9.04%
- YTD
- 4.07%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQO.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.88%
- YTD
- 15.53%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 32.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPI.L IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP | 4.07% | -12.96% | 20.45% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 15.53% | 6.57% | 11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPI.L and QQQO.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank
AAPI.L
QQQO.L
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.46 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 4.71 | -3.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 11.27 | -8.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.37 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 1.18 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPI.L drawdown since its inception was -31.31%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPI.L and QQQO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.31% | -21.70% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.90% | -7.04% | -11.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.13% | -0.66% | -9.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -4.40% | -10.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.29% | 2.95% | +5.34% |
Volatility
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that AAPI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPI.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 3.90% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.01% | 8.93% | +5.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 14.00% | +5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 17.34% | +6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 17.34% | +6.45% |
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPI.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison
AAPI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, less than QQQO.L's 67.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPI.L IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP | 11.05% | 11.04% | 1.04% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 67.52% | 124.53% | 17.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPI.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AAPI.L.
AAPI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQO.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AAPI.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.
Find the right allocation for AAPI.L and QQQO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer