AAPI.L vs. MSFI.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AAPI.L (IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP) and MSFI.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.

Performance

AAPI.L vs. MSFI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) and IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AAPI.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFI.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AAPI.L vs. MSFI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP GBP (AAPI.L) and IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP GBP (MSFI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Volatility

AAPI.L vs. MSFI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AAPI.L and MSFI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.

Dividends

AAPI.L vs. MSFI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AAPI.L nor MSFI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AAPI.L or MSFI.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPI.L or MSFI.L?

AAPI.L and MSFI.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.