AAPD vs. SEF
AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -16.24%/yr vs -10.34%/yr for SEF. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
AAPD vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -12.45% return, which is significantly lower than SEF's 8.89% return.
AAPD
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- -12.45%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- -33.84%
- 3Y*
- -16.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 8.89%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.34%
- 5Y*
- -5.21%
- 10Y*
- -11.50%
AAPD vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | -12.45% | -11.41% | -21.45% | -30.42% | 21.49% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 8.89% | -9.82% | -17.81% | -8.81% | 1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPD and SEF is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2022 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPD vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
AAPD
SEF
AAPD vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 1.06 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 0.39 | -1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 0.73 | -2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.52 | 0.26 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.49 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
AAPD vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -59.79%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.79% | -96.51% | +36.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.37% | -9.72% | -27.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.07% | -39.40% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.19% | -96.09% | +36.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.19% | -82.72% | +48.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.16% | 5.14% | +18.02% |
Volatility
AAPD vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to ProShares Short Financials (SEF) at 3.01%. This indicates that AAPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPD | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 3.01% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.01% | 10.85% | +5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.36% | 14.34% | +8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 17.96% | +9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.02% | 20.52% | +6.50% |
AAPD vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPD vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, more than SEF's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | 3.84% | 3.60% | 4.55% | 4.37% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.35% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPD and SEF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPD has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to SEF (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -59.79% vs SEF's -96.51%.
On 3-year performance, SEF leads with -10.34% vs -16.24% for AAPD. On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SEF has performed better with a -10.34% return vs -16.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.
AAPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.84%, compared with 3.35% for SEF.
AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 0.95% for SEF.
SEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPD and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer