PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPD vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPD vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 450.36% return.


AAPD

1D
-1.92%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-13.97%
YTD
-13.18%
1Y
-34.80%
3Y*
-16.55%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-15.73%

MUU

1D
14.92%
1M
-26.01%
6M
169.13%
YTD
450.36%
1Y
3,107.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
458.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.85M$121.65M$106.46M
$1.48B$1.48B$2.29B

AAPD vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AAPD
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares
-13.18%-11.41%-7.59%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
450.36%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPD and MUU is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPD vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPD
AAPD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
AAPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPD vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPDMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-20.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.64

-0.88

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.86

46.30

-47.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

149.20

-150.58

AAPD vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPD Sharpe Ratio is -1.35, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 19.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPD and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPD vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPDMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.02%

-75.07%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.60%

-68.07%

+27.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.53%

-55.16%

-4.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-24.49%

-10.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.30%

21.08%

+4.22%

Volatility

AAPD vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) is 10.59%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 63.27%. This indicates that AAPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPDMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

63.27%

-52.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.23%

134.06%

-113.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.84%

161.74%

-135.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.45%

146.75%

-119.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.45%

146.75%

-119.30%

AAPD vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPD vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than MUU's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AAPD
Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares
3.52%3.60%4.55%4.37%0.53%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
1.23%4.27%0.31%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPD and MUU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (63.27%) compared to AAPD (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -63.02% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3107.14% vs -34.80% for AAPD. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, AAPD has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3107.14% return vs -34.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.

AAPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.23% for MUU.

AAPD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPD and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer