AAPD vs. FLYD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -16.55%/yr vs -55.10%/yr for FLYD. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FLYD.

Performance

AAPD vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly higher than FLYD's -35.79% return.

AAPD

• 1D: -1.92%
• 1M: -1.06%
• 6M: -13.97%
• YTD: -13.18%
• 1Y: -34.80%
• 3Y*: -16.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.73%

FLYD

• 1D: -4.90%
• 1M: -5.05%
• 6M: -41.66%
• YTD: -35.79%
• 1Y: -50.80%
• 3Y*: -55.10%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -63.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	$133.85M	$121.65M	$106.46M
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	$99.59K	$120.72K	$126.93K

AAPD vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	-13.18%	-11.41%	-21.45%	-30.42%	20.24%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-35.79%	-60.42%	-54.13%	-75.14%	1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPD and FLYD is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.43

Return for Risk

AAPD vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAPD

AAPD Risk / Return Rank: 1
AAPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
AAPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
AAPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAPD vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAPD	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.35	-0.66	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	-0.71	-1.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	0.92	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.89	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	-1.66	+0.29

AAPD vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPD Sharpe Ratio is -1.35, which is lower than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPD and FLYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAPD vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and FLYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAPD	FLYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.02%	-98.52%	+35.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.60%	-57.09%	+16.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.16%	-94.84%	+41.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.53%	-98.52%	+38.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-83.66%	+48.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.30%	30.58%	-5.28%

Volatility

AAPD vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) is 10.59%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 22.74%. This indicates that AAPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAPD	FLYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	22.74%	-12.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.23%	64.36%	-44.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.84%	76.85%	-51.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.45%	83.52%	-56.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.45%	83.52%	-56.07%

AAPD vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FLYD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAPD vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while FLYD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares	3.52%	3.60%	4.55%	4.37%	0.53%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAPD and FLYD in my portfolio?

AAPD and FLYD have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAPD or FLYD?

FLYD has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to AAPD (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -63.02% vs FLYD's -98.52%.

Which ETF is better, AAPD or FLYD?

On 3-year performance, AAPD leads with -16.55% vs -55.10% for FLYD. On fees, FLYD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AAPD has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AAPD or FLYD?

Over the 3-year period, AAPD has performed better with a -16.55% return vs -55.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAPD or FLYD?

FLYD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAPD or FLYD?

AAPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for FLYD.

What is the main difference between AAPD and FLYD?

AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 0.95% for FLYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.