AAPD vs. CARD
AAPD (Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - AAPD tracks the Apple Inc. (-100%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AAPD returned -16.55%/yr vs -50.22%/yr for CARD. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAPD charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
AAPD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPD achieves a -13.18% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's -15.06% return.
AAPD
- 1D
- -1.92%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -13.97%
- YTD
- -13.18%
- 1Y
- -34.80%
- 3Y*
- -16.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.73%
CARD
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -12.56%
- YTD
- -15.06%
- 1Y
- -41.26%
- 3Y*
- -50.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -53.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.85M | $121.65M | $106.46M | |
| $41.47K | $47.63K | $45.74K |
AAPD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | -13.18% | -11.41% | -21.45% | -0.16% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -15.06% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -32.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPD and CARD is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
AAPD
CARD
AAPD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.94 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.95 | +0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | -1.49 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPD drawdown since its inception was -63.02%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPD and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.02% | -93.74% | +30.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.60% | -43.65% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.16% | -93.74% | +40.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.53% | -93.62% | +34.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -69.62% | +34.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.30% | 28.00% | -2.70% |
Volatility
AAPD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares (AAPD) is 10.59%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 23.64%. This indicates that AAPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.59% | 23.64% | -13.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.23% | 54.62% | -34.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.84% | 72.00% | -46.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 80.45% | -53.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.45% | 80.45% | -53.00% |
AAPD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPD has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
AAPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPD Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X Shares | 3.52% | 3.60% | 4.55% | 4.37% | 0.53% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPD and CARD have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (23.64%) compared to AAPD (10.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPD dropped -63.02% vs CARD's -93.74%.
On 3-year performance, AAPD leads with -16.55% vs -50.22% for CARD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AAPD has been the lower-risk option at 10.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, AAPD has performed better with a -16.55% return vs -50.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for AAPD.
AAPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
AAPD tracks Apple Inc. (-100%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.06% for AAPD and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPD and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer